Introduction: A Brief Analysis of Mother
The increased use of the mimeograph machine by writers in the 1960s paved the way for the production of new Little Magazines in an era known as the Mimeograph Revolution. A mimeograph allowed an author to type what they wished to produce on a stencil that could then be used to produce multiple copies of the same work. Once enough individual works were compiled, they were put together to create issues of Little Magazines that could be distributed wherever, whenever. Using this technology allowed writers and artists to publish their work outside the confines of established editors and publishers, which encouraged artistic liberty. These are the more obvious facts of this era, but the finer details of the influence of these magazines, the inspirations behind them, and their purpose have yet to be completely recognized. As Alan Golding writes in From Outlaw to Classic, “Closer attention to those magazines would force us to see literary history not only as a history of individual careers, important books, and competing discourses but also as a history of writing communities.” Poet Peter Schjeldahl, one of the co-editors of the Little Magazine Mother, acknowledges this mass sharing of experimental literature as a form of building communities.
Influenced by the Mimeograph Revolution, though not produced by a mimeograph, Schjeldahl helped curate Mother, a Little Magazine intended to be thought-provoking and distinctive; an undertaking of new literature. Discussed in a later interview in 1988, Schjeldahl revealed that the curation of Mother began “when I dropped out of college I worked my way east as a newspaper reporter, and I was a poet and became part of the New York poetry scene, and published a literary magazine called Mother. And that time, the mid ’60s, was the last high point for poetry. Poetry went into the toilet in the late ’60s. But you know at the time when poetry was dead, painting was dead too. Painting revived; poetry is still there.” In his interview with Lee Harwood in 1966, Schjeldahl describes a wide range of knowledge on fellow young poets due to his familiarity with so many Little Magazines, claiming that “all of literature is now available” in avant-garde mediums like the Little Magazines. Without the dismantlement of the confines of large publishers that disallow more provocative or experimental works, the themes that arise in poetry at this time might not have been possible.
In this analysis of Mother and a few supplementary sources, questions about the magazine’s purpose, making, and influence will be answered as well as they can, based on the materials gathered. Mother has a majority male contributor demographic, ironic due to the title, and studying the works included by the male contributors gives insight into the value, or lack thereof, of women poets and artists. Despite the platform the Mimeograph Revolution gives to less represented writers, our project on Mother shows that the suppression of such contributors continues to be prominent.
An interview with Peter Schjeldahl in 1966 gives those intrigued a further look into the finer details of Mother. Schjeldahl accredits the inspiration of this little magazine to French surrealism, which was a new take on art. Issues 1 and 2 give homage to this style, as has many surreal poems and artworks inside. He describes him and the other contributors of Mother as “wide open to any sort of lively influence. One thing that has characterized the younger generation of poets is a sense of not being threatened by anything, no sense of natural enemies.”
This defining freedom that poets became aware of is easily recognizable within the pages of Mother as you’ll see within the contents of this analysis. Schjeldahl gives many good quotes in his interview with Lee Harwood describing Little Magazines, which are listed below. But it is to be noted that despite as inspiring, memorable words he gives us in reference to the literature the Mimeograph Revolution has fabricated, majority of the contributors of Mother are male, and what Schjeldahl gives credit to is just half of what else there could have been.
The following are quotes gathered from Peter Schjeldahl's interview with Lee Harwood describing the impacts in literature Little Magazines had on the New York School:
“...it’s the solidest, most fun, and it has produced the best writing. See what the very best young talents of the last five years have been doing,“
“It makes literature, poetry, important. Important on its own terms,”
“The new work is pristine experience. You’re either up to it or not… Whether you think it’s important or not is whether you think literature is important or not… It’s at once a very aesthetic and a very tough position,”
“The new writing doesn’t depend on what a writer is… but on what he does,”